Search results
547
filtered / sorted
results
(showing
391
to
400
of
547)
Defence Airspace and Air Traffic Management
Statement of Need
• Military Requirement – National Security
• International Engagement – UK/US
• Economic
Defence Airspace and Air Traffic Management
Issues and Opportunities
• Current Airspace Management reporting inaccuracies
• Current airspace utilisation
• Inefficient processes leading to confusion over status of airspace
• Under-utilised CDRs
• Limitations of current route structure
• Challenging timeline, constraints of CAP1616 process
• Demand on NATS, CAA and MOD pers
Defence Airspace and Air Traffic Management
Options to Exploit Opportunities or
Address Issues
• Improve ASM processes/organisations/knowledge through trials and
engagement
• Interim design kept within constraints of existing en-route structure
• Include development of new/amended CDRs
• Anticipated use of trial process to refine and test designs/processes
Defence Airspace and Air Traffic Management
Level and Process
Defence Airspace
Last updated: 09 March 2018
The purpose of the Assessment Meeting as set out in detail in CAP 1616 is
broadly for the Sponsor to present and discuss their Statement of Need, to enable the CAA to
consider whether the proposal concerned falls within the scope of the formal airspace change
process and to enable the CAA to consider the appropriate provisional Level to assign to the
change proposal.
Last updated: 09 March 2018
It is believed that this Statement of Need qualifies as a Level 0 Airspace change as the
amendment is limited to the Prohibited, Res tricted and Danger Areas Category, with the Proposed Change being in the Remarks
column, as per CAP 1616, Appendix A, Table A2.
Last updated: 09 March 2018
It is believed that
this proposal should be cons idered as a Level 0 change as defined in CAP 1616 Appendix A, Table A2 under Category Prohibited,
Res tricted and Danger Areas , Proposed Changes to Remarks .
Last updated: 09 March 2018
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group
Agenda for CAP1616 Assessment Meeting
CAA
All
Change Sponsor
Change Sponsor
CAA
All
All
1.
Last updated: 01 March 2017
© 2018 NATS (En-route) plc NATS Unclassified
4162-CAP1616-DesPrinEvalOptAs◊Issue 1 Page 4 of 24
2.
Last updated: 23 February 2018
© 2018 NATS (En-route) plc NATS Unclassified
4162 CAP1616 Design Options Issue 1 Page 3 of 11
1.
Last updated: 23 February 2018
In any event, Gatwick Airport must still undertake the requirement set out in the CAA’s letter of
14 August 2013 to undertake a full review of the conventional SIDs
as it is now clear that:
• traffic has not flown the track over ground of the 2012 Route 4 Conventional SIDs in
significant volumes since 14 November 2013;
Continued (2 of 2 pages)
• the review process will involve the weighing of various discordant factors in order to
come to a conclusion on the corrected location of the Route 4 conventional SIDs; and
• the correction of the Route 4 conventional SIDs may result in the movement of the
easterly leg of those SIDs
Gatwick Airport may only conduct this full review through the airspace change process as set
out in CAP1616 and in accordance with the Air Navigation Guidance 2017.
Last updated: 13 February 2018
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group
Agenda for CAP1616 Assessment Meeting
1.
Last updated: 26 January 2018
CAP1616 Gateway documentation
Stage 1: Define Gateway
Design Principles
for PLAS Dep5 ScTMA
Level 2 Change (above 7000ft)
© 2018 NATS (En-route) plc NATS Unclassified
PLAS Dep5 ScTMA Design Principles Page 2 of 6 Issue 1.0
Publication history
Issue Month/Year Change Requests in this issue
Issue 1 Jan 2018 Submitted to CAA.
Last updated: 25 January 2018
