Search results
547
filtered / sorted
results
(showing
321
to
329
of
547)
This review refers to the periodic requirement (normally every
5 years) for airports with Instrument Flight Procedures to review the SID
designs to ensure they remain fit for purpose; for example, this requirement
takes into account the need to check annual obstacle data to assure
adequate terrain clearance is maintained.
11.2 Additionally and separate to the review described in 11.1, GAL were required
to determine whether the conventional SID should align with the NPR or
should remain in its 2012 location or something else (as determined by the
CAP 1616 Airspace Change process).
Last updated: 06 January 2020
In my note I mentioned that in order to reduce the risk of confusion amongst local stakeholders
our intention, if a review of the conventional SIDs in accordance with the CAP 1616 Airspace
Change Process is unavoidable, that the Route 4 RNAV SIDs ACP (Ref: ACP-2018-86) and the
proposed review of the conventional SIDs should be conducted separately.
Last updated: 06 January 2020
In particular that:
“GAL is to carry out a review of the Route 4 conventional S1Ds, as has been envisaged
since 14 August 2013”
…
Page 3 of 5
“This review is to take place through the airspace change process as set out in CAP 1616
and in accordance with the Air Navigation Guidance 2017.
Last updated: 06 January 2020
considered equivalent to CAP 1616 level 1, would it be required to
follow the full CAP 1616 process or do you envisage a more scalable
process?”
Last updated: 20 December 2019
The operator/licensee of an aerodrome at
https://cms.caa.co.uk/cap1616
https://cms.caa.co.uk/cap1616
http://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?
Last updated: 19 December 2019
Airspace changes must be developed and proposed by a change
sponsor in accordance with the CAA’s airspace change process, as
set out in CAP 1616.
Last updated: 19 December 2019
(By delivering, we mean preparing and submitting to the CAA for a
decision in accordance with our airspace change process, known as CAP1616.)
3.25 The answer is that under the licence condition NERL is required to prepare and
submit in the first instance only the necessary changes to the airspace which
NERL is responsible for as identified in the masterplan.
Last updated: 17 December 2019
CAP 1865 Executive summary
December 2019 Page 6
Next steps
8.
Last updated: 13 December 2019
CAP 1616 Airspace Design, Guidance on the regulatory process for
changing airspace design including community engagement
requirements; the ACP process is contained within.
Last updated: 29 November 2019
