Search results
547
filtered / sorted
results
(showing
311
to
320
of
547)
In respect of airspace change
CAP 1616 and CAP 1616a1 provide the relevant methodologies for use in
environmental assessments to assist those preparing airspace change
proposals.
Last updated: 02 March 2020
The CAA’s proposal is to use a process
similar to that in CAP 1616.
Last updated: 02 March 2020
Iteration Three will be used to inform gateway 3 of the CAP 1616 process.
Last updated: 27 February 2020
Since we met I have been made aware that although the Lee on Solent change was conducted under the
requirements of CAP724 and CAP725, the PIR should be written embracing the spirit of the new CAP1616
requirements.
Last updated: 24 February 2020
Should you not achieve this, then in accordance with the conditions of the
DfT’s letter, you would be required to resubmit the proposal as a new ACP under the CAP 1616
process.
Last updated: 19 February 2020
Airspace Regulation
Airspace, ATM & Aerodromes
Safety & Airspace Regulation Group
Civil Aviation Authority
Aviation House Gatwick Airport South West Sussex RH6 0YR www.caa.co.uk
Telephone @caa.co.uk
By e-mail
Mr
London Southend Airport
1st July 2019
Dear ,
Southend Airspace Change Proposal (ACP) – CTAs 10 and 11
Further to our previous communications, this letter is to confirm that London Southend Airport (LSA)
may continue with ACP-2017-25 (CTAs 10 and 11) under the Air Navigation Guidance 2014 (CAP
725 process), as amended by the requirements set out by Department for Transport (DfT) in a letter
to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) dated 10 June 2019 (the DfT Letter).
Last updated: 19 February 2020
Due to the fact that the review work had not commenced before CAP1616
became effective, the CAA decided to adopt some principles from the
CAP1616 Stage 7 process where it was possible to do so.
Last updated: 06 February 2020
With the introduction of the CAP 1616 process in January 2018, we
decided to adopt some principles of the CAP1616 process, hence the CAA
decision to publish the data and seek feedback on the data and the impact of
the change.
Last updated: 06 February 2020
Kind Regards
From:
Sent: 17 January 2019 16:56
To:
Subject: Cranfield RWY03 IAPs - additional questions
Hi
I apolgise for what might appear to be a number of inconsequential questions but I have been made aware that
although the Cranfield change was conducted under the requirements of CAP724 and CAP725, the PIR should be
written embracing the spirit of the new CAP1616 requirements.
Last updated: 29 January 2020
The CAA’s proposal
is to use a process similar to that in CAP 1616 for ACPs and, in particular, this
may require some form of proportionate noise modelling to assess the
environmental effects of a relevant PPR.
Last updated: 08 January 2020
