Search results
547
filtered / sorted
results
(showing
291
to
300
of
547)
CAP 1943 Summary of the CAA’s Provisional Conclusions
September 2020 Page 14
24.
Last updated: 17 September 2020
The CAA’s airspace change process is a seven-stage mechanism that is set out in detail
in CAP1616 (formerly CAP 725).
Last updated: 01 September 2020
Although that formal decision would come at the end of the procedure,
and will be taken independently, there will need to be formal discussion between
the CAA teams during the design process.
14 www.caa.co.uk/cap1616
15 Although the new procedure is quite separate from the CAP 1616 airspace change process, any change
in airspace design that is proposed by a sponsor under the CAP 1616 process could well include a
change in airspace classification.
Last updated: 16 July 2020
This is because such a proposal would constitute a
significant change in airspace design, where the impacts must be thoroughly
assessed through the more detailed CAP 1616 process.
Last updated: 01 July 2020
The requests for a trial should be in accordance with the trial procedure
as published in CAA publication CAP1616 ‘Airspace Change’.
Last updated: 28 May 2020
This review refers to the periodic requirement (normally every 5 years)
for airports with Instrument Flight Procedures to review the SID designs to
ensure they remain fit for purpose; for example, this requirement takes into
account the need to check annual obstacle data to assure adequate terrain
clearance is maintained.
11.2 Additionally and separate to the review described in 11.1, GAL were required
to determine whether the conventional SID should align with the NPR or
should remain in its 2012 location or something else (as determined by the
CAP 1616 Airspace Change process).
Last updated: 21 September 2020
This exercise was not a requirement under the CAP 725 airspace change process that this
ACP is being decided under.
Last updated: 06 May 2020
In my note I mentioned that in order to reduce the risk of confusion amongst local stakeholders
our intention, if a review of the conventional SIDs in accordance with the CAP 1616 Airspace
Change Process is unavoidable, that the Route 4 RNAV SIDs ACP (Ref: ACP-2018-86) and the
proposed review of the conventional SIDs should be conducted separately.
Last updated: 06 May 2020
In particular that:
“GAL is to carry out a review of the Route 4 conventional S1Ds, as has been envisaged
since 14 August 2013”
…
Page 3 of 5
“This review is to take place through the airspace change process as set out in CAP 1616
and in accordance with the Air Navigation Guidance 2017.
Last updated: 06 May 2020
Details on Levels assigned to
Airspace Change Proposals (ACPs) to scale the process can be found in Table 2 of CAP
1616 located here.
Last updated: 01 May 2020
