Search results
547
filtered / sorted
results
(showing
301
to
310
of
547)
Irrespective of whether the CAA decision to approve the change was made
under the previous process (set out in CAP 725), we will conduct all Post
Implementation Reviews in accordance with the process requirements of
CAP1616.
Last updated: 30 March 2020
This work is carried out through an airspace change process, guidance to which is
published in our regulatory document CAP1616 ‘Airspace Design: Guidance on the
regulatory process for changing airspace design including community engagement
requirements’.
Last updated: 18 March 2020
The CAA’s airspace change process is a seven-stage mechanism that is set out in
detail in CAP 725/CAP1616.
Last updated: 13 March 2020
The change sponsor (RSP) submitted their application (Statement of Need) to begin an
airspace change under CAP1616 on 5 November 2018.
Last updated: 03 March 2020
The evidence we use to consider those factors, and
how it should be prepared, is set out in our regulatory process ‘Airspace Design:
Guidance on the regulatory process for changing airspace design including
community engagement requirements’(CAP1616).
12.
Last updated: 02 March 2020
Change sponsors are required to follow
our airspace change proposal (ACP) process, which is set out in CAP 1616.
Last updated: 02 March 2020
CAP 1895
JUNE 2019 Page 5
The CAA’s role as a statutory consultee under planning law
6.
Last updated: 02 March 2020
If it does make an airspace change proposal it will need to do so in compliance
with the detailed CAP 1616 process and associated guidance.
25.
Last updated: 02 March 2020
Further, CAP 1616 and the Air
Navigation Guidance 2017 do not place any requirement on the CAA in terms of
regulating noise on the ground at airports.
3.3 In Table 3.1, we set out the CAA’s comments on the above documents together
with some general comments.
Last updated: 02 March 2020
CAP 1892 Appendix A: The CAA’s regulatory roles and statutory functions
MARCH 2018 Page 8
6.
Last updated: 02 March 2020
