Search results
547
filtered / sorted
results
(showing
241
to
250
of
547)
The latest version of the regulation can be found in CAP 1789A.
Last updated: 06 July 2022
The penalty
18 CAP 2280 contains the draft version of this document and details of the consultation.
Last updated: 19 April 2022
Change sponsors are required to follow our
airspace change proposal (ACP) process, which is set out in CAP 1616 before
submitting a proposal to us for decision.
Last updated: 05 April 2022
Therefore, a 5-year periodic review of DIAPs will need to be carried out as part of the
CAP 1616 Pt 1c process for these IAPs to be approved and published in the UK AIP.
Last updated: 14 March 2022
Irrespective of whether the CAA
decision to approve the change was made under the previous process (set out in CAP
725), we will conduct all Post Implementation Reviews in accordance with the process
requirements of CAP1616.
Last updated: 07 March 2022
However, the
ACP process delivered through CAP 1616, is complex involving a lot of analysis, investigation,
and significant levels of engagement with relevant stakeholders.
Last updated: 31 January 2022
This report has been prepared on the basis that the reader has knowledge of both
the airspace classification review procedure (CAP 1991) as well as the related
airspace change proposal (ACP) process5 (CAP 1616).
Last updated: 31 January 2022
SLOS admitted CAP 553 could have been better communicated to the GA community.
Last updated: 27 January 2022
To implement any new departure procedures, a
sponsor would need to go through the airspace change process (as detailed in CAP
1616) to ensure that the best solution for the circumstances is proposed.
Last updated: 14 January 2022
The CAA also
ensures adherence to the CAP 1616 airspace change process.
1.8 The AMS shared strategic vision and objectives are therefore informed by
government policy and the CAA’s statutory duties.
Last updated: 10 January 2022
