Showing 1891 to 1900 of 1941 results
-
Gatwickcemandate (PDF)
The relevant circumstances at Gatwick include: 1‘Review of price and service quality regulation at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted airports: Setting the scene for Q6’ http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/5/Q6SettingScene.pdf • CAA’s initial views on SMP and regulatory design2 • airline and airport views about the needs of future passengers; at the airport; • the variety of business models at the airport; The document also covers: • CAA objectives for CE • legal context for the review • scope of airports activities under review • strategic questions for discussion • duties of the Regulator – division of responsibilities • CAA expectations of participants’ behaviour; • CAA use of Constructive Engagement material • consent to consult The CAA will retain overall responsibility for economic regulation, which may include setting price controls, and for instigating the processes leading up to and informing
-
CAP1421 (PDF)
There has been significant media and public interest in the reported collision between an aircraft and a drone at Heathrow in April 2016, although the subsequent investigation found that a drone was probably not involved.
-
CAP1711B Edition 1 (PDF)
There are air traffic concepts already in use, such as time-based separation at Heathrow, where the use of such information is used in conjunction with aircraft performance data and analysed to optimise arrival spacing, reducing fuel burn and emissions.
-
CAP1343 (PDF)
Currently, we have issued licences to Heathrow Airport Limited and Gatwick Airport Limited. 14 'Prioritisation Principles for the CAA's Consumer Protection, Competition Law and Economic Regulation Work' (May 2015) http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP1233%20PrioritisationPrinciplesfortheCAAsConsumerProtectionCompetitionLawandEconomicRegulationWork%20May%202015.pdf http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP1233%20PrioritisationPrinciplesfortheCAAsConsumerProtectionCompetitionLawandEconomicRegulationWork%20May%202015.pdf CAP 1343 Chapter 3: Parallel regimes October 2015 Page 13 Where we are already dealing with, or had dealt with, an issue under the ACRs 3.6 If we also received a complaint that the same behaviour already complained about under the ACRs was also prohibited under UK and European competition law15, or was a licence breach under CAA12, we would normally assess the complaint only under the ACRs and not under the other legislation as well.
-
CAP1346 A6 (PDF)
SID/Data used during analysis Issue Initial Options from SARG IFP For PIRG to Consider Impact of Issue & Initial Options Outcome of PIRG Final Review of Route Issues & SARG IFP Options SARG IFP Recommendations 3 (cont) restriction at KKW19 is due to interaction with Heathrow Rwy 09 MID SIDs, initial re- examination of the altitude attainment diagrams (see below) indicates a/c are climbed above 4000ft significantly earlier on the SID profile The documented level restriction rationale of the RNAV 1 SID is as follows: KKE05 +2500: Noise Abatement KKN09 @3000: Noise Abatement KKW19 @3000: Airspace Containment and Separation against EGLL DVR SID KKW26 @4000: Airspace Containment and Separation against EGLL MID SID the analysis), average alt 4950ft amsl, and 95% were at/above 4000ft amsl by KKW19 with an average altitude of 6550ft AMSL.
-
CAP1291 (PDF)
Currently, we have issued licences to Heathrow Airport Limited and Gatwick Airport Limited. 14 'Draft Prioritisation Principles for the CAA's Consumer Protection, Competition Law and Economic Regulation Work' (October 2014) http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP1233Draft%20prioritisation%20principles.pdf http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP1233Draft%20prioritisation%20principles.pdf CAP 1291 Chapter 3: Parallel regimes April 2015 Page 13 We are already dealing with, or had dealt with, an issue under the ACRs 3.6 If we also received a complaint that the same behaviour already complained about under the ACRs was also prohibited under UK and European competition law15, or was a licence breach under CAA12, we would normally only assess the complaint under the ACRs and not under the other legislation as well.
-
CAP 749 (PDF)
For the vast majority of staff this means they are still located in and around the main BA operational centres, in particular Heathrow and Gatwick.
-
ORS9 Decision No. 0059 For UK Reg 139 2014 (PDF)
Example 1 SNOWTAM proposal issued by London Heathrow Tower which includes situational awareness and Plain Text remarks.
-
CAP 762 (PDF)
• Start condition: Glasgow Airport, MTOW, engines off parked • Flight plan for a South Departure for London Heathrow (LHR) from Runway 05 • Weather: 5km Visibility, 500ft cloud base, no rain, wind 030/15kts • Engine flameout during early turn onto SID (2 NM DME) • Frequency changes, turbulence and weather problems en-route to delay recognition of the engine failure • Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) will not start resulting in electrical load shedding • Further reasonable problems to maintain workload • Microburst 2.2 Analysis of Accident Data for Scenario 1 2.2.1 The initial accident reports from BEA and BFU were analysed in detail.
-
Final Report Appendices Publication Version (1) (PDF)
In this appendix, we consider the potential options for addressing the similar concerns in this case. 4 CC Heathrow Airport Ltd and Gatwick Airport Ltd price control review, paragraphs 83 to 90 https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140402235745/http:/www.competition-commission.org.uk/assets/competitioncommission/docs/pdf/non-inquiry/rep_pub/reports/2007/fulltext/532af.pdf D2 Background 6.