Search results for 'heathrow'

BA Submission To CAA Final Q6 LGW Proposals FINAL (PDF)

Much of the analysis applies to Heathrow as well as to Gatwick and some of the papers are common to both responses.

European Express Association Response To CAP3202 (PDF)

However, the 1991 TDRs have imposed significant operational constraints on express services by restricting all-cargo flights at Heathrow and Gatwick during periods that are essential to time-definite networks.

ACC Final Response 06 11 131 (PDF)

It is also inconsistent with the CAA’s treatment of Heathrow and its expected finding that Gatwick has market power. 8.28 As Gatwick has market power it is not reasonable for it to be able to determine potentially very large runway 2 costs outside the licence change process.

CAP1029 (PDF)

Outsourced security staff are also used by the AOC to operate baggage security at Heathrow.

CAP1227 (PDF)

It also includes data on the passengers carried and the estimated number of passengers affected by cancellations and long delays5. 4 www.caa.co.uk/CAP1126 5 This data combines the CAA’s Punctuality Statistics from Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted, Luton, Manchester, Birmingham, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Newcastle, and London City, and data on cancellations provided directly by airlines.

CAP3116 (PDF)

The CAA fully recognises the importance of our role in supporting the timely implementation of airport capacity planning decisions, not least the third runway at Heathrow.

OR6_171 (PDF)

The matter to be investigated is the following: bmi complained to the CAA that in deciding on its structure of airport charges from 1 April 2011, Heathrow Airport Ltd (HAL) had: a. unreasonably discriminated against bmi and passengers on domestic routes by equalising domestic and EU passenger charges; b. unreasonably discriminated against short-haul carriers (including bmi) by basing landing charges solely on noise values; and c. unfairly discriminated against bmi by implementing the charging regime from 1 April 2011 instead of phasing it in gradually.

GAL CAP1476 Response (1) (PDF)

Registered Office Destinations Place, Gatwick Airport, West Sussex, RH6 0NP 30 JANUARY 2017 Rob Toal Civil Aviation Authority CAA House 45-59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE Dear Rob, Re: CAP 1476 Future of Service Quality regulation for Heathrow Airport Limited: Consultation on the design principles for a more outcome-based regime” We have been reviewing the CAA consultation CAP1476 “Future of Service Quality regulation for Heathrow Airport Limited: Consultation on the design principles for a more outcome-based regime” with interest.

Factor F05/2006 (PDF)

Follow-up Action on Occurrence Report SERIOUS INCIDENT INVOLVING TO BOEING B747-132, N-481EV, NEAR THE COMPTON VORON 24 APRIL 2004 (AIRCRAFT FLEW ACROSS LONDON DURING DIVERSION TO HEATHROW AIRPORT) CAA FACTOR NUMBER : F5/2006 FACTOR PUBLICATION DATE : 10 February 2006 OPERATOR : Evergreen International Airlines CAA OCCURRENCE NUMBER : 2004/02501 AAIB REPORT : Bulletin 1/2006 SYNOPSIS (From AAIB Report) The aircraft was carrying out a cargo flight from Ramstein in Germany to Wright Field in New York State.

Local Impacts – Noise

Aircraft noise and communities

It retains direct responsibility for regulating noise at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted.