Showing 1161 to 1170 of 1941 results
-
20012026 Star Alliance Response CAP3195 V1 FINAL (PDF)
A primary objective must be to encourage a culture of cost efficiency and genuine transparency in Heathrow, which the current framework has failed to do over many years.
-
Factor F13/2003 (PDF)
The damage to the hull resulted in the aircraft having to be withdrawn from service and a substitute aircraft flown into Heathrow.
-
CAP1438 (PDF)
This includes London Heathrow, Cardiff, Exeter, London Luton and Sumburgh.
-
Regional And Business Airports Group Response To CAP3202 (PDF)
RFS links to Heathrow could handle 20-30% more without hub slots
-
Safetynotice2025010 (PDF)
Applicability: Aerodromes: All – Awareness Air Traffic: All – Awareness Airspace: Not applicable Airworthiness: Maintenance, CAMO, Part CAMO, Part CAO Flight Operations: All CAT / SPO / NCC / GA Licensed/Unlicensed Personnel: All – Awareness 1 Introduction 1.1 The UK CAA have been advised of recent events occurring at London Heathrow Airport, whereby aircraft have been the subject of pitot blockages that resulted in airspeed discrepancies, high-speed rejected take-off and associated crew actions.
-
Lakeside Efw (1) (PDF)
As you may be aware Heathrow Airport Limited’s proposals for a 3rd runway at Heathrow will lead to the demolition of our Lakeside EFW facility.
-
CAP 1469 IAG Second Response (1) (PDF)
A85845535 UK Branch Registered Address International Airlines Group 2 World Business Centre Heathrow, Newall Road, London Heathrow Airport, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW6 2SF Registered in England & Wales BR014868 Mr Richard Moriarty Group Director of Consumers & Markets Civil Aviation Authority K5, CAA House 45-59 Kingsway London C2B 6TE 6th January 2017 Dear Richard, Modification to HAL’s Licence & Proposals for the Treatment of Planning Costs, second submission CAP1469 We are concerned by the changes to HAL’s economic licence, announced by the CAA on 21st December 2016.
-
20012026 Air Canada's Response CAP3195 Consultation (PDF)
January 19, 2026 Sent via email to: economicregulation@caa.co.uk Subject: Response to CAP3195 Consultation – Heathrow Airport Regulation Dear Sir/Madam, Air Canada welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation and commends the CAA for initiating a review of Heathrow’s regulatory model.
-
CAP1940 Transport For London (Tfl) (PDF)
Transport for London City Planning 5 Endeavour Square Stratford London E20 1JN tfl.gov.uk 18 August 2020 Dear Sir, Madam, Economic regulation of Heathrow consultation I am writing further to publication by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) of the CAP 1940 consultation on the economic regulation of Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL).
-
CAP1513 (PDF)
http://www.caa.co.uk/CAP1435 http://www.caa.co.uk/CAP1469 http://www.caa.co.uk/CAP1279 http://www.caa.co.uk/CAP1332 http://www.caa.co.uk/Commercial-industry/Airports/Economic-regulation/Licensing-and-price-control/Economic-licensing-of-Heathrow-Airport/ http://www.caa.co.uk/Commercial-industry/Airports/Economic-regulation/Licensing-and-price-control/Economic-licensing-of-Heathrow-Airport/ CAP 1513 Chapter 1: Executive summary February 2017 Page 4 Chapter 1 Executive summary 1.1 This Policy Statement sets out our decisions on the regulatory treatment of the costs Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL) will incur in seeking planning permission to develop a new northwest runway and capacity expansion at Heathrow Airport.