Methods are developed and utilised both within the CAA and industry to assess how HF/HP influences have prevented or contributed to incidents, to avoid future occurrences.
We will continue to develop our methods of gathering information to improve our understanding of the impact of HF/HP on reportable incidents and accidents. The variability of the terminology and the differing significance attributed to contributory factors continues to be a challenge. By its very nature, reactive reporting does not collect data on events which did not occur. Much more could be learnt if we could also capture the everyday dynamic actions of the people that keep aviation safe. Reporting the positive actions of those involved with the task requires a more open approach to reporting systems.
To support this approach, we will continue to promote a just culture which is essential to generate an open reporting environment. There is real value in reporting beyond what is legally required. Encouraging reporting of any issues or concerns supports the development a deeper understanding of the information that is gathered. We will look for indicators of proactive involvement in safety by employees, as markers of a just culture and mature Safety Management System (SMS). We will promote investigation into areas of potential under-reporting and promote methods to improve reporting.
The aim is that everyone involved in aviation is engaged in the development of a more proactive approach to gathering HF/HP information. This will enable the industry to be more responsive, allocate resources to the most significant risks, and to be assured that appropriate mitigations are developed.