FAQ Answer
FAQ Answer
Will CAP 168 still be the main regulatory document for national aerodromes?
The decision to retain CAP 168 or replace it with a document more closely aligned with EASA regulations has not been taken yet. However, any replacement document will be consistent with CAP 168.
EASA Aerodromes
- Will the aerodrome licence fee increase?
- When will the EASA regulations take effect?
- Will there be a chance to opt out?
- Can an aerodrome be exempted from the scope?
- Will CAP 168 still be the main regulatory document for aerodromes that fall within the scope of EASA?
- Will there be cost implications to aerodrome licence holders following the introduction of EASA aerodrome regulations instead of CAP 168?
- What will happen to aerodromes that do not fall within the scope of EASA?
- Will CAP 168 still be the main regulatory document for national aerodromes?
- In the future will the aerodrome inspector be from the UK CAA or EASA?
- How does EASA define "Commercial Air Transport Operations"?
- Can the EASA regulations be influenced?
- How is the UK CAA involved in the proposed changes?
- Which aerodromes will fall within the scope of EASA?
- How is the UK aerodrome industry involved in the proposed changes?
- Will there be grandfather rights for existing licensed aerodromes?
- How will the CAA notify industry of significant developments in the rulemaking process?
- Will there be a transition period when the new rules come into effect?
