FAQ Answer
FAQ Answer
Will there be cost implications to aerodrome licence holders following the introduction of EASA aerodrome regulations instead of CAP 168?
Licensed aerodromes in the UK currently follow the requirements specified in CAP 168 that closely match the Standards and Recommended Practices (SARP) published in ICAO Annex 14 – Aerodromes. It is not envisaged that new EASA aerodrome regulations will be more onerous than the SARPs currently specified in ICAO Annex 14.
EASA Aerodromes
- Will the aerodrome licence fee increase?
- When will the EASA regulations take effect?
- Will there be a chance to opt out?
- Can an aerodrome be exempted from the scope?
- Will CAP 168 still be the main regulatory document for aerodromes that fall within the scope of EASA?
- Will there be cost implications to aerodrome licence holders following the introduction of EASA aerodrome regulations instead of CAP 168?
- What will happen to aerodromes that do not fall within the scope of EASA?
- Will CAP 168 still be the main regulatory document for national aerodromes?
- In the future will the aerodrome inspector be from the UK CAA or EASA?
- How does EASA define "Commercial Air Transport Operations"?
- Can the EASA regulations be influenced?
- How is the UK CAA involved in the proposed changes?
- Which aerodromes will fall within the scope of EASA?
- How is the UK aerodrome industry involved in the proposed changes?
- Will there be grandfather rights for existing licensed aerodromes?
- How will the CAA notify industry of significant developments in the rulemaking process?
- Will there be a transition period when the new rules come into effect?
